| Fig. # |
|
Descripton |
Page |
| 1 |
|
PERT/CPM Network Diagram of Model Development |
5 |
| 2a/2b |
|
Time-scaled Network Of Model Development and Testing |
5 |
| 3 |
|
Simplified Drawing of Well/ Aquifer Model |
6 |
| 4 |
|
Location of Pressure Head Measuring Piezometers |
8 |
| 5 |
|
Scanivalve Calibration Curve |
9 |
| 6 |
|
Instrumentation Layout |
9 |
| 7 |
|
Flow Chart of Model Data Acquisition System |
9 |
| 8 |
|
Flow Chart of Model Data Logging Cycle |
10 |
| 9 |
|
Mechanical Grading Analysis of the Santa Barbara Model Aquifer |
11 |
| 10 |
|
Calculated Hydraulic Conductivity for the Santa Barbara Model Aquifer |
11 |
| 11 |
|
Mechanical Grading Analysis of the Silverado Formation |
12 |
| 12 |
|
Calculated Hydraulic Conductivity for the Silverado Model Aquifer |
12 |
| 13 |
|
Well Screen Head Loss Sketch |
13 |
| 14 |
|
Log-log plot of CL/D vs Head Loss Coefficient |
15 |
| 15 |
|
Concept of Well Efficiency Showing Well Loss and Formation Loss |
15 |
| 16 |
|
Summary Sheet of Initial 25 Tests |
18 |
| 17-23 |
|
Summary of Regression and Correlation Analysis |
42 |
| 24-48 |
|
Graphical plots of the Regression and Correlation Analyses (Appendix) |
42 |
| 49-73 |
|
49-73 Semi-logarithmic Plots of Water Level vs Distance for the Initial 25 Tests (Appendix) |
42 |
| 74 |
|
Percentage Open Area vs Effective Well Radius |
23 |