The Well / Aquifer Model (Initial Test Results)   -   20


Therefore, of the significant parameters measured in the first series of tests, there is a total of 10 possible groupings of variables upon which regression and correlation analysis can be performed. The regression, or estimation of one variable (the dependent variable) on another (the independent variable), for the 10 maximum combinations, is the subject of the following section. The degree of relationship between the variables, or the indicator that tells how well the regression equation describes or explains the relationship, is quantitatively measured using correlation analysis.

For the variables in equation (32) only simple regression and correlation was used. The purpose of the analyses was twofold:

  1. To verify existing known relationships (e.g., h vs V) and show that model analogy and test procedures were valid.
  2. To establish new relationships by experimental observation and analysis which could lead to better understanding the basic factors affecting well design.


6.2   Methods of Analysis

Three types of simple regression were used to analyze the 25 test results from the Santa Barbara and Silverado aquifers:

These three equations were fit to the observed test data using the method of Least Squares. In order to quantitatively measure the degree of explained or unexplained variations between the variables, the correlation coefficient (r) was calculated, namely:

or

where:

Yest = estimated value of dependent variable.
= mean value = Y/N
Y   = actual or measured value as obtained from test data
N   = number of observations

From equation (35), the unexplained variation can be derived to be

The following analysis consists of calculations of simple regression and correlation for all the variables of equation (32) as well as the unexplained variation.


Back   |   R & D Home   |   Next