Analysis of Development Methods for Gravel Envelope Wells   -   5

Results depicted in Figures 9, 10 and 11 are typical of all the test results with both 6 10 and 6 14 sands. Initial development of motion depends upon either the existence or creation of free space in which particles of pack material can move. Once particles are free to move, the scale of motion depends upon jet velocity, overburden pressure, the degree of compaction of the filter pack, and intergranular friction. The influence of each of these factors was apparent in the tests.

Considering only the effect of jet velocity, it was clear that reduction in flow velocity reduced the depth of penetration once the system was in motion. A second increase in jet velocity would not generate penetration depth equal to that attained initially, a somewhat surprising result. The explanation lies in the greater degree of compaction attained in the pack material by the jetting action over what was initially present. This phenomenon is illustrated in Figure 11. This was also confirmed in another test, in which the overburden pressure was suddenly released to allow the filter pack material to move. The whirling mass of fluid and filter pack subsided to about half of its initial extent as the pack material compacted. In general, penetration depth attained with a smooth rounded sand (6 10) appeared to be marginally greater than that with a sharp angular sand (6 14).

All tests were performed with a 0.167 inch diameter jet. In order to simulate the effect of a larger diameter jet, the jet, originally ¾ inch from the screen, was moved back to provide a larger impact area. This test, which was performed on a gravel pack that had been in motion, indicated that the effect of the jet impact area was not significant. As can be seen in Figure 12, where the jet is 20 diameters from the screen, motion of the pack material and depth of penetration increased as overburden pressure was released. This result confirms that it is jet power which controls the dimension of the filter pack movement and not jet diameter.

Figure 12

To summarize, the key element in getting pack material into motion is the ability of the jet to create moving space by washing out fine materials from the filter pack in progressive fashion described. If the filter pack is compacted, and of a size distribution that none will pass through the well screen, it appears no motion is possible. Once the pack material is in motion it can be sustained with lower velocities than are required to initiate motion. The size of the moving region is a function of the power available in the jet relative to the power necessary to keep a given volume of fluid and pack material in motion. The relationship of these conclusions to actual well development will be reviewed in Section 3. No discussion is presented here of the potential deleterious effects of creating filter pack cavities. This consideration, however, is important in filter pack selection when jetting development methods are to be used.


2.2   Development By Line Swabbing

Line swabbing is the term given to hauling a close fitting rubber flanged scow through the well. As shown in Figure 2, its purpose is to develop a pressure differential across the section of well containing the swab. This pressure differential results in flow being forced into the well screen on the high pressure side and out of the screen on the low pressure side. Because the scow is equipped with a foot valve, it drops easily and the process can be repeated.

Modeling the flows developed by this process must be done in two stages. First there is radial production flow generated by placing the swab in motion. This is accompanied by a steady state motion about the swab when seen from coordinates moving with the swab. We look at each of these separately, since analysis of the system over the complete range of motion is very difficult.


Back   |   R & D Home   |   Next